I dont agree the universe is expanding. Its a bubble and inside the universe is jiggling but it makes u think?

Question

Hi
Ive ask before but im going to give it a shot again to understand.

Just because all galaxys are moving away including us all same sorrounding directions.. Does NOT mean the universe is expanding.

What if the actual whole universe AND the galaxys are moving together at the same time? Which makes it as if the galaxys are only moving away and that teh unvierse is not expanding by trying to understand that.

What if the universe is just a giant bubble and that the bubble (universe) is moving in one direction like a floating bubble which makes it look like as if all the galaxys in that buble are moving away OR that everything is moving away INSIDE the universe and rotates back around. But the bubble universe is huge but does not mean its expanding but more likely floating on something. That something is something we cant see.

Because the universe is far too big.. you wont be able to see no edge.

And by the way just because you think the unvierse is expanding.. can you virtually see it expanding? if so show prove the universe material is expanding. No because you cant see it nor have 100% evidence of it. You can see galaxys moving away but you cant see the material of the universe itself... otherwise show me how you can see the universe expanding.

Plus remember we dfont have technology to see that far YET of the inture universe. We can only see distance but virtually regardless how big the telescope is out there... it wont help searching deeper into space because the universe is MASSIVE and your only looking a portion of it which is quite small but for us it looks far on telescope but virtually its not.

So i beleive the universe is a bubble and its floatinga way its a giant bubble and its not expanding its allready expanded.. and all your seing is that the inside of the bubble is moving away because the presure of the bubble is moving ONE direction in a straight line of the unknown where its going.

What do you think ?

One would think.... if the universe is indeed expanding... then what is on the outerlayer of the universe that the universe has not touch yet? its of something.

Its hard to think that space is huge and that the outerlayer of the universe is a empty thing.... and that i dont believe its goes forever.. there has to be some unusual stops

Imagine 4 wallas until that small dust hits that wall oneday. Your virtually in the centre of a giant 4 wall dark room.

Answer 1

The idiot from Australia is ranting again....

Answer 2

There is no way to prove anything 100%...this is an unreasonable request. All we have is empirical data, and thus logically we can never prove that ANY theory is definitely correct. This is easily seen in the history of physics, where current theories describe current phenomena VERY well, but then we find something new and the theory changes.



I do not understand your explanation of galaxies moving away from us. If we are all in a "bubble" moving together, then shouldn't galaxies all appear static (i.e. they are not moving towards us or away from us). OR, are we all just bouncing around inside the bubble (which is also moving through something else). In this case, you would expect that the velocities would be random--that is, for any given galaxy the doppler shift (it's velocity towards or away from us) would be independent of the distance it is away.



So if you plotted velocity versus distance away, you would expect to see a scatter plot going both positive and negative. However, when we take the measurements and plot the graph, you get a very nice straight line: look at the graph on this page...the points appear to form a straight line http://www.exo.net/~pauld/activities/astronomy/expandinguniverselecture.html



Your theory does not support that data. You cannot explain why we appear to see a straight line when your theory predicts randomness.

Answer 3

Your opinions on the matter, when not based on an understanding of science or empirical observation, are irrelevant.



There is a large body of evidence supporting the inflation of the universe. All of this evidence is publicly available, in a variety of locations. There is a character limit on this website, so I doubt anyone here can teach you 10 years worth of advanced physics and mathematics in a few paragraphs.



When riding in a car, when you come to a bridge, do you get out and look it over good before crossing to ensure that is was properly designed and in good condition? No, you trust the engineers to have done their job properly, and you just cross the bridge. The same goes for things like advanced science. You have 2 options here. Either you can trust the experts, the people who spend their lives studying these things and looking for the truth, or you can go get an education in this field and spend YOUR life studying the topic and come up with your own answer. I am a bridge engineer. The guys at NASA just drive across the bridges, without thinking about it. I think I'll give them the same courtesy and trust when it comes to the universe.

Answer 4

I really hope you're just trolling, because your arguments make no sense. Your allcaps rage emphasizes that.

Science makes observations, and tries to explain them. Telescopes have observed that galaxies appear to all be moving away from each other. This is based on wavelengths observed, and a phenomenon called Red Shift. This observation IMPLIES that the universe is expanding. That's where the theory comes from. The idea that we are in a bubble does not explain anything. Do you have any evidence or observations to support this? Like someone said, if we were all traveling in a bubble in the same direction, our speed of travel RELATIVE to each other would be zero, and that doesn't explain the observed expansion.

If you have any more questions, please try to keep them succinct and sensible.

Answer 5

If the whole universe was moving in one direction, it wouldn't even appear that galaxies are moving. The galaxies might be moving relative to the bubble but they would be stationary relative to us. Even if all the galaxies were moving in one direction, that wouldn't be correct either. We see that galaxies are expanding away from us due to the redshift of those galaxies. This means that the Doppler shift causes the colour of galaxies to shift towards the red part of the spectrum. This is proof that everything is moving away from us since every galaxy has a redshift that is always increasing. If the galaxies were all moving in 1 direction, half of the galaxies would be redshifted while the other half would be blueshifted. This is not the case.

Answer 6

The universe isn't actually expanding at all. The idea that it does comes from misinterpreting galactic redshifts as a doppler effect when they are actually a scattering effect. The galaxies are not generally receding from each other at all. Their light simply loses energy through it's interaction with the intergalactic medium... http://www.newtonphysics.on.ca/hubble/index.html



If the universe was expanding quasars would show time dilation effects but they don't:

http://phys.org/news190027752.html



This documentary may enlighten you:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YfE7doPzm5I

Answer 7

what the heck are you talking about.....



you have ZERO proof that the universe is expanding. scientists have EVIDENCE that the universe is expanding NOT just because the galaxies are moving away but because of radiation waves and other things like that.



read some science books if you want the facts.

Answer 8

Your arguments are lame. Don't capitalize your words- it doesn't add to your point. You can't see matter, no one sees the galaxies moving away. Mathematics are being used to prove the idea that the universe is expanding. Sure, we're not physically being stretched, but anything with matter is moving away from the source of the Big Bang.Also, you can't think of infinities in terms of finite concepts . You must again use mathematics. Infinite is just that- infinite. There are no boundaries. It's hard to wrap your head around this, but it's just like infinities in numbers- there is no end.

Answer 9

it's possible that the currently observed expansion is part of a "pulse" which may change direction , but to base any theory on less than 60 years of fairly accurate observations and extrapolate it to 14-16 billion years is logical nonsense, like seeing a ginger cat and assuming all cats are ginger

Answer 10

Do you really have nothing better to do than come on here spouting your ideas about a theory you haven't even properly understood before vehemently disagreeing with it and then shouting at people when they point out your mistakes?



'The galaxy has nothing to do with the universe' is almost as good as 'light has nothing to do with what you see'. You really are clueless, aren't you?

Answer 11

Theories -which are worthy of critical thought- are derived from evidence, not solely from the imagination.



I didn't read the words in CAPS because it is difficult.

Answer 12

u num 6-1



hope it helps



/Uniontera Ja

Answer 13

I don't think "virtually" means what you think it means.



.