Did Neil Armstrong really land on Moon?If yes, why did he refuse to swear on Bible?

Question

A good attempt but Neil Armstrong and his allies were wrong.They were unable to land on Moon.Instead, they reached an American desert.If they landed on Moon, how was the American flag wavering despite absence of air and water (complete vacuum)????

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronauts_Gone_Wild

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_moon_landing_hoax_accusations

Answer 1

How sad

Answer 2

Yes, all the rocks and soil which had a slightly different isotopic content than the average for Earth and no water content at all, not even water of crystallization were faked so well that all the geochemists in countries other than the USA were deceived. And the sample returned by a Soviet automated probe which matched the composition of the American samples must have been faked as well. Of course, rocks gathered in Antarctica have a different isotopic content from the average for Earth and no water, even though Antarctica was once much warmer than it is now.



And every radio engineer on Earth was incapable of detecting TV and radio signals from the direction of the Moon in 1969, even though the British detected the movement of the German High Seas Fleet in 1916 by observing that the source of it's wireless telegraphy signals moved. All that basic technology was forgotten in the following 53 years, I suppose - and so was radar.



Naturally, the Soviet Union complained loudly of fraud in 1969. Or did they send congratulations?



Does it ever occur to you that there were scientists and engineers in dozens of other countries who would have spotted a fraud immediately?



Some 40,000 people, thousands of whom were not even American who worked on the Moon landings have kept quiet about this hoax for 43 years. Somebody must be paying therm to keep quiet.

Answer 3

The flag was NOT waving. Seriously, go and look at the footage, and find us an example of the flag waving when as astronaut is not moving it. Find us an example of it waving in a breeze. Go on, we'll wait.



Neil Armstrong really did land on the Moon. He refused to swear on the Bible because he knew damn well who the man asking him to do so was. He is called Bart Sibrel, and he is making a living from calling the astronauts liars. He asked every surviving Apollo astronaut to swear on the Bible. Three of them did. Did Sibrel alter his stance about the landings? Not a chance. Those who refused to swear were hiding something and couldn't lie in the face of God. Those who did swear did it to hide something and are going to hell for lying in the face of God. Armstrong knew this and refused to play his game, and good for him. Sibrel deserves no quarter from the men he has been insulting for years.



Sibrel is NOT interested in the truth, he is interested in denigrating the achievements of people with more talent in the little fingers than he has in his whole bulky frame. His only interest is in making the astronauts look bad by any means possible, a fact he admitted when he tried to sue Buzz Aldrin for assault after Sibrel provoked Aldrin into taking a swing at him. He is a fraud and a liar, and i know this from personal correspondence with him. He knows damn well he is peddling crap, but as long as he gets his money and gets his name recognised somewhere he doesn't give a damn whose reputation he treads on to do it.



Neil Armstrong was a true hero. Not even an American hero, a true hero of all humanity. He achieved an amazing thing, catapulting him into the history books, but he always maintained his place as part of a team, never sought fame and notoriety from his achievements, and never coasted on his fame, remaining a busy working man for the rest of his life. Sibrel is an **** who thinks he can get fame by standing on those achievements, but Sibrel will be forgotten about in a few years, mentioned only by space enthusiasts and then only in derogatory terms. Armstrong will be remembered throughout the rest of future history.



Apollo was real. Deal with it.

Answer 4

I fail to see the logic here.



You're proposing that he was in on a lie. That he willingly faked the whole flight and landing, yet was unwilling to seal the deal by swearing to the lie.



Hogwash.



Go sit in on any criminal trial. People who consider themselves good Christians will routinely put their hand on a Bible and swear to tell the truth, then sit in the witness box and lie out their a$$es.



If Armstrong had been willing to help create such a fraud, there is little chance he wouldn't have also "sworn" it was true.



You're wasting your time with this, troll.

Answer 5

Because he refused to participate in the lie about the lunar landings were hoaxed.



As well since he was a modest man, he no longer wanted to be a part, or rather victim of a witch hunt.

Answer 6

Read this, kid: http://www.clavius.org/envflutter.html





why did he refuse to swear on Bible?



George Carlin explains why: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgnWP7jD-0I

although I don't believe that you're man enough to watch all 2 minutes of the explanation.



Now, you say that Armstrong refused to swear on a Bible. I'll have to trust your word on it, because I don't know if it really happened or if instead you are lying to suit your own purpose. And since the man has already died a couple of days ago, I don't see how it would matter. So please, stop giving people more reasons to hate your religion, because you're actually doing a great job in showing us why we should stay away from your religion -- instead of giving a good example of your own kind. Every year I meet less and less people who say they are catholics and who are actually kind to others. Every year I see nothing but hate and prejudice from your religion, the very opposite of what you claim to profess. But please continue, you're doing a great job at showing what you really are; I couldn't do it better myself.

Answer 7

Do you realise what you propose? This ranks on the stupid scale of 1 to 10, at 10. Think it through and try to see where your proposal is woefully wrong. And do show where the flag was waving under the influence of an atmosphere, I think you cannot.



Or is this trolling?

Answer 8

The flag pole (i think) had a sort of spirng in it and the flag itself had a wire mesh in it

So the flag wasn't waving it was more bouncing around and because there's no air on the moon there was nothing to stop it "boucing", no friction

"an object in motion stays in motion unless acted on by an outside force"

Answer 9

high-definition photos taken by the LROC spacecraft of the Apollo landing sites have captured the lander modules and the tracks left by the astronauts. In 2012, images were released showing the Apollo flags still standing on the lunar surface. I suppose that you think that this high definition photos taken by the LROC spacecraft are also fake.

Answer 10

The poor man has been dead less than 24 hours and here you are defaming him.



Why not search for the other thousand times this disgusting question has been asked?



Wake up kid, somebody has been lying to you and it was not the late Neil Armstrong, or NASA, or your history teacher, if you have one. it was somebody trying to make money from you, possibly some slimy b@stard like Bart Sibrel.



You're lucky I'm not reporting you for defaming the dead. Now go away and don't come back.

Answer 11

Muhammad,



You are all alone in your ignorance. I suggest that next time, you go find some credible support for your wrongful argument, if you can find any legitimate backers (scientists, political leaders, religious institutions, heads of government, business or educational institutions, etc.) at all. If you do happen to find one, be sure to come back to this forum and tell us who they are.



I'm pretty sure you won't be back.





Regards

Answer 12

I believe that there's a facility to edit questions.



Please use it to add an explanation of why the Russians didn't blow the whistle on a fraudulent American propaganda triumph at the height of the Cold War.



(I really must get around to putting that in a text file so I can copy and paste it.)

Answer 13

Because when they do they get insulted and stalked and called liars and cowards by the idiots like Bart Sibrel.

Answer 14

Idiot.



Come to my house and swear on a Bible that your name is really Muhammad. You won't do it? Then I am certain your name is not Muhammed.



Do you see how stupid that sounds?

Answer 15

Ignorance is a disease that is carried by choice.

As you sew, so shall you reap.

I hope you get what you deserve and all around you mirror your attainments. You will live in a Hell on Earth.

Dumb question: would you use your Lords name in vain? Yes, I suppose you do, constantly. *sigh*

Answer 16

Flag waves in same way food floats around up there dumb ***.

Answer 17

Are you retarded?

Answer 18

…………..,-~*`llllllllllllllllllllll lllll¯`*-,

………,-~*lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll… llllllllllll*-,

……,-*lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll… lllllllllllll.\

….;*`lllllllllllllllllllllllllll,-~*~-… lllllllllllllllll\

…..\lllllllllllllllllllllllllll/………\;;… llllllllll,-`~-,

…...\lllllllllllllllllllll,-*………..`~-~…

…….\llllllllllll,-~*…………… …)_-\..*`*;..)

……..\,-*`¯,*`)…………,-~*`~ ………….../

……...|/.../…/~,…...-~*,-~*`; …………./.\

……../.../…/…/..,-,..*~,.`*~*… ……….*...\

…….|.../…/…/.*`...\...………… ………)….)¯`~,

…….|./…/…./…….)……,.)`*~-,……….../….|..)…

……/./.../…,*`-,…..`-,…*`….,---…...\…./…

…...(……….)`*~-,….`*`.,-~*.,-*……|…/.…/……

…….*-,…….`*-,...`~,..``.,,,-*……….|.,*.…

……….*,………`-,…)-,…………..,-*`...,-*….(`-,…