?
2014-02-02 19:21:58 UTC
I'm familiar with the official arguments as to why the universe supposedly doesn't have a centre, but they've never made sense to me. What they say is that there's no centre of expansion, therefore there's no centre. But centre of expansion != centre. Example: If you place an explosive in the outer edge of a doughnut and then set it off, the centre was not where you placed the explosive. Admittedly, the doughnut has no centre, as it's a torus, but that has nothing to do with where you put the explosive. If it were a jelly doughnut, it would have a centre.
To my understanding, we don't actually understand the nature of the universe's edge. I will gladly admit that I'm not an expert, but from what I've heard, we don't know whether the universe has some kind of boundary, like a domain wall, or whether it just loops back around like an old video game.
Unless I'm missing something, it seems to me that all that's really being effectively argued is that the universe might or might not have a centre; we have no way of knowing, and if it does, it's probably nothing special. If it loops around and/or has a shape like a torus or shell, it has no centre; otherwise, it does.
Again, I'm fully willing to admit that I could be missing something. I just know what I've outlined above. But I'd like to understand this better. Could someone clarify this for me?