Question:
why were ancient cultures terrified of the planet mars?
anonymous
2006-02-21 06:36:19 UTC
why were ancient cultures terrified of the planet mars?
Nine answers:
Raider Ken
2006-02-23 16:04:47 UTC
The Mysteries of Mars



Why did so many of the early cultures worship the Planet Mars? They were terrified of this strange planet. It was called the "God of War." Why? (The term "martial arts" is still in our working vocabulary.) And there are other mysteries that seem to be associated with this strange planet.



The recent space age discovery of "orbital resonance"-the tendency of orbits to synchronize on a multiple of one another--has led to a fascinating conjecture that the orbits of the Earth and the Planet Mars were once on resonant orbits of 360 days and 720 days, respectively. A computer analysis has suggested that this could yield orbital interactions that would include a near pass-by on a multiple of 54 years, and this would occur on either March 25 or October 25. Such near pass-bys would transfer energy, altering the orbits of each.



In near proximity, such pass-bys would be accompanied by meteors, severe land tides, earthquakes, etc., and this would help explain why all the ancient cultures were so terrified by the Planet Mars and why calendars tended to reflect either March or October. A series of such pass-bys could also explain a number of the "catastrophes" of ancient history, including the famous "long day of Joshua" and several other Biblical episodes.



Stability appears to have been attained during the last near pass-by in 701 B.C., resulting in Earth's and Mars' present orbits of 365 1/4 days and 687 days, respectively. Provocative, but where's the evidence?



This remarkable conjecture, that Mars made pass-bys near the Earth, would seem to be corroborated by Jonathan Swift (1667-1745) in his famous fantasy known as Gulliver's Travels. In his third voyage, Gulliver visits the land of Laputa, where the astronomers brag that they know all about the two moons of Mars. Their highly detailed description includes the size, the rotation, the revolutions, etc., of each of the two moons.



What makes this particular allusion so provocative is that the two moons of Mars were not discovered by astronomers until 151 years after Swift's publication of Gulliver's Travels in 1726. It was in 1877 that Asaph Hall, using a new telescope at the U.S. Naval Observatory, shocked the astronomical world by discovering the two moons of Mars.



What makes the two moons so difficult to see is that they are only about 8 miles in diameter and have an albedo (reflectivity) of only 3%. They are the darkest objects in the solar system: they are almost black. The two moons are also unique in their rotations and one of them is the only object in the solar system that orbits in reverse. For Swift to have "guessed" these correctly is absurd.



Yet the telescopes of his day were inadequate to have actually seen these objects. But then how could he have known what the astronomers of his day did not? Swift, in order to embroider his satirical fiction, undoubtedly drew upon ancient records he probably assumed were simply legends, not realizing that they were actually eye witness accounts of ancient sightings when Mars was close enough for the two moons of Mars to be viewed with the naked eye!



Other Implications



The possibility that the Planet Mars interacted with the Planet Earth may have implications beyond simply ancient perturbations of our calendar and the subsequent veneration of October 31 as Halloween. It has been widely noted that the ancient Stonehenge monument in England and the Great Pyramid at Cairo have astronomical implications. The geometric and mathematical mysteries of these fabled monuments have been the subject of much conjecture. Cairo was founded on August 5, A.D. 969 by conquering Fatimid armies and named, "Al Kahira," after Mars. Why?



And there are other enigmas.



The Nebular Hypothesis



Most of us have been taught that the planets of our solar system came out of the sun. It may come as a surprise that there are serious scientific difficulties with this presumption. In fact, a careful analysis of existing evidence suggests some surprising alternative possibilities.



Immanuel Kant, in his General History of Nature and Theory of the Heavens, in 1755 in Germany, theorized that some four billion years ago, the sun had ejected a tail, or a filament, of material that cooled and collected and thus formed the planets. Kant is generally credited as the originator of what is commonly called the "Nebular Hypothesis," but the originator was actually Emanuel Swedenborg (1688-1772).



Swedenborg wrote his treatise on cosmology in 1734, in Latin: Prodromus Philosophiae Retiocinantis de Infinito et Cause Creationis. Some 21 years before Kant's publication, Swedenborg proposed that the planets were the result of condensations of a gauze or filament ejected out of the sun. Swedenborg was a mining engineer with a wide range of interests and also claimed to have psychic powers. Historians and biographers seem to take him quite seriously and a number of public incidents caused his fellow Swedes of Stockholm to regard him as irrefutable. He claimed confirmation of his nebular hypothesis from séances with men on Jupiter, Saturn and other places more distant.



(Some 20 years earlier, in 1712, when Swedenborg was 24 years old, he had the opportunity to visit with Edmund Halley at Cambridge, who described to him the various aspects of comets and their tails. Halley had made a study of the reports of various medieval comets, their orbital trajectories, dates, and descriptions, and, of course, is famous for his predictions regarding the comet that still bears his name.)



The famous mathematician Pierre Simon Laplace (1749-1827) lent his endorsement to Kant's theory, but without checking the mathematical validations he was capable of providing. Thus, the nebular hypothesis gained widespread respectability despite serious mathematical flaws. Subsequent writers have continued to develop variations of this view even though increasing difficulties render it increasingly doubtful.



Enigmas Increase



The sun contains 99.86% of all the mass of the solar system. Yet the sun contains only 1.9% of the angular momentum. The nine planets contain 98.1%. There is no plausible explanation that would support a solar origin of the planets.



James Jeans (1877-1946) pointed out that the outer planets are far larger than the inner ones. (Jupiter is 5,750 times as massive as mercury, 2,958 times as massive as Mars, etc.)



Other observations seem to raise even more provocative enigmas concerning our planetary history:





There are three pairs of rapid-spin rates among our planets: Mars and Earth, Jupiter and Saturn, and Neptune and Uranus, are each within 3% of each other. Why?



Earth and Mars have virtually identical spin axis tilts (about 23.5°). Why?



(From angular momentum and orbital calculations, it would seem that these three pairs of planets may have been brought here from elsewhere.)



Why does Mars have 93% of its craters in one hemisphere and only 7% in the other? It would appear that over 80% occurred within a single half-hour!



There are other mysteries and we certainly must take most of the conjectures in the field of cosmology as simply what they are: conjectures. But the more we learn, the more we have come to take the Word of God more seriously. After all, He made them all and ought to know! But He has left the thrill of discovery to us all if we will but trust Him:



It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honor of kings is to search out a matter. - Proverbs 25:2



The secret things belong unto the LORD our God: but those things which are revealed belong unto us and to our children for ever, that we may do all the words of this law. -Deuteronomy 29:29



We hope that this brief article will provide some conversation for a warm summer evening.



I hope this helps some
aaroniouse
2006-02-25 14:24:36 UTC
maybe because they lived on closer terms with astrological implications and since the implications for mars have to do with war, they are very important to pay attention to. Such as now, we are at war. And isn't mars spinning retrograde or something?

Off subject a little, I had a dream of mars. I only knew I was on mars because I just did. I floated above parallel channels of water and rock, with green succulent and moss-like plants in the water and on the rocks, lit by golden sunlight. Outside of the channels the red planet stretched across the horizon, barren and empty.
kittybriton
2006-02-21 06:50:20 UTC
In ancient Greek and Roman mythology, Mars was the god of war, and the planet Mars was thought to govern the winning, or losing of wars.
anonymous
2006-02-21 06:39:10 UTC
I think it represented the coming of wars and violence. Ancient cultures strongly believed in Astrology and mars is the planet of action.....but also blood.

Martial arts comes from the word Mars.
shadowshark11
2006-02-21 09:14:48 UTC
Because Mars is the name for Aires, the greek (and Roman) god of WAR. The religion practiced by the Greeks and Romans wasn't well known except around the Mediterranian. The spread of christianity brought about the English almost abolished that phobia, but some inborn fear of Aires getting pissy and coming to earth with rock-slinging Titans (parents and grandparents of the gods) and take over the world!!! BWAHAHAHAHA!!!!







HA!!!!
Nacho Massimino
2006-02-21 06:52:40 UTC
They were terrified with war, not really with Mars. The greek representation of war was the planet Mars because of its redish colour.
anonymous
2006-02-25 05:14:01 UTC
Perhaps, because Mars was associated with the god of War...

Or they could have just feared the unknown...

Red is a beautiful color to be admired and pursued though...
coogle
2006-02-21 06:46:33 UTC
simply because it appears red in the sky

i suppose
cockzeppelin
2006-02-21 06:37:57 UTC
because they didn't know jack about it


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...