If I'm wasting my time, so be it, but I'm still going to try to educate you as to why this is bullshit.
Firstly, if you take ANYTHING on youtube seriously.. well, there's your first problem. As for Google Sky, I don't have any experience with the program, but logical guesses would either be it's incomplete, or that area had something classified, such as a millitary satellite in it, and the government requested it be taken down. I just pulled it up and do not see this "empty area", however. Can you direct me to the spot you're claiming is there?
As for "knowing" there's a huge telescope on the south pole to track it, that's simply false. The SPT cannot track a planet, or even see one. It's a microwave telescope, not a visual one, designed to survey extremely distant galatic clusters, objectively to help make sense of the Dark Energy theory. To visually see something as close as planet, you could see it from virtually anywhere on Earth, and most certainly anywhere in the Southern Hemisphere. A planet could not be hidden so that it could only be seen from the South Pole. Planets travel across somethign known as the Ecliptic, which is the axis most objects are aligned around the sun in, loosely speaking.
Lastly, and reason this is completely nonsense, is if something would be visible in one year with the naked eye, it would be EASILY visible in any sized telescope, not just professional ones, but in something any amatuer could purchase quite cheaply. In fact, even if it were "invisible", as the conspiracy theorists claim (which is rediculous), it's gravity would still bend light around it (this is known as gravitational lensing) and block out anything behind it, so it would still be easy to see that something was there.
Edit: i followed those coordinates, and there's most definately not an empty patch of sky there. It's in the Constellation Orion, just SE of the red giant star Betelguse, an area of the sky i'm quite familiar with. There's plenty of lower magnitude stars in that area of the sky, though it is not a heavily populated region of space. If you're refering to the fact that when zoomed in far enough, there's no image available, it's because nothing at higher magnifcation was added to google (zooming is actually changing to a different logical image, not "zooming" like you would with binoculars). As to WHY that is? Well, my best guess is because from an astronomical definition, it is pretty "empty". Using a starchart program (Stellarium, it's free and very accurate), I took a look there. There's virtually nothing of interest within several arc minutes aside from Betelguse itself. No galaxies, no clusters, nothing. So there's probably just no pictures of the area at higher magnication submitted to google.